Introduction of Indian Sign Language in Inclusive Education

SP Goswami, Anita Ravindra GGR, Kanchan Sharma


Purpose:  The predominant mode of human communication is speech, and whenever it is hindered, humans resort to the tactile-kinaesthetic mode.  Use of sign language by persons with speech-hearing impairments is a classic example of such adaptation. The Demonstration School at the Regional Institute of Education in Mysuru, South India, undertook training of typically-developing students in Indian Sign Language (ISL), so as to facilitate communication and instruction of students with hearing impairment who are in mainstream learning environments. 

Method: Training in ISL was imparted to140 typically-developing students in higher primary classes. Twenty-four 40-minute sessions were conducted over a month. After theoretical orientation in logical bases of manual communication, practical training commenced with elementary manual alphabets, progressed through essential daily-life vocabulary necessary to construct simple sentences and carry out general conversations, and culminated in signing the Indian National Anthem.

Results: Typically-developing students gained primary benefits such as improved awareness about non-verbal communication modes, mastery of basic skills in ISL, and positive attitudes towards sign languages.

Conclusion: The UNCRPD 2006 authorises sign language as the linguistic identity of the Deaf, and encourages the use of sign language in learning environments. Future research should add to the findings on secondary benefits in the form of scholastic and sociometric advantages derived by students with hearing impairments who receive instructions in sign language in mainstream learning environments.


Inclusive-schools; hearing-impairment; hearing-peers; sign-language

Full Text:



Armstrong DF, Stokoe WC, Wilcox SE (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge, UK: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Armstrong DF, Wilcox SE (2007). The gestural origin of language. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bellugi U, Fischer S (1973). A comparison of sign language and spoken language. Cognition, 1973(1): 173-200.

Berke J (2018). Who uses sign language? Deaf and other non-verbal users of sign language. Available at: [Accessed on 7 Dec 2018].

Demaske DM (2010). The differences between how boys and girls learn and the benefits of single gender schools. ETD Archive. Paper 572.

Esam S (1981). A proposed new notation. Edinburgh working papers in linguistics. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh.

Everyday Health (2018). Five reasons to learn sign language. Available at: [Accessed on 7 Dec 2018].

Fischer SD (1974). Sign language and linguistic universals. In Rober G& Rewett N. (Eds). Acts du colloque Frenco-Allemand de Grammaire Transformable(vol. 2). Tuingen: Niemeyer.

Gardner H (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Government of India (2009). Right to Education for All Act.

Government of India (2016). Rights to Persons with Disabilities Act.

Herbert J (1978). How conference interpretation grew. In Gerver D & Sinaiko HW (Eds). language interpretation and communication. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

James AN (2007). Teaching the male brain: how boys think, feel, and learn in school. Washington, DC: Corwin Press.

Kyle JG, Woll B, Carter M (1979). Coding british sign language. Bristol, UK: School of Education Research Unit, University of Bristol.

Kyle JG, Allsop L (1982). Deaf people and the community: final report to the nuffield foundation. Bristol, UK: Bristol School of Education, Bristol University.

Kyle JG, Woll B (1985). Sign language: the study of deaf people and their culture. Cambridge, UK: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Kyle JG, Woll B (1985). Sign language: the study of deaf people and their language. Cambridge, UK: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Lane H (1984). When the mind hears: A history of the deaf. New York, NY: Random House.

Lane H, Philip P (1984). The deaf experience: Classics in language and education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Llewellyn-Jones P (1981). Simultaneous interpreting. In Woll B, Kyle J, Deuchar M (Eds). Perspective on BSL and Deafness. London, UK: Croom Helm.

Martin DL, Pitcher DC (2006). Acquisition of syntax. In Shick B, Marschark M, Spencer PB (Eds). Advances of sign language development in deaf children: perspectives in deafness. Oxford, NY: OUP: 231-261.

Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (2001). Estimate of children with hearing loss Vide Notification No. 16-18/97-NI. New Delhi, India: Government of India.

Mulvey J (2010). The feminization of schools. EdDigest: The Education Digest; 75(8): 35-38.

National Institute for Deafness and other Communication Disorders - NIDCD (E.d.). Cited in Everyday Health (2018). Five reasons to learn sign language. Available at: [Accessed on 7 Dec 2018].

O'Rourke T, Medina T, Thames A, Sullivan D (1975). National Association for the Deaf Communicative skills program. Programs for the Handicapped; April: 27-30.

Siple P (1978). Understanding language through sign language research. New York, N: Academic Press: 362-363.

United Nations Organisation-UNO (2006). United Nation Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Wells CG (1981). Learning through interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wilbur RB (1987). American Sign Language: linguistic and applied dimensions (2nded). Boston, MA: A College-Hill Publication, Little Brown & Company.

Woodward J (1978). Historical bases of ASL. In PS (Ed). Understanding language. Boston, MA: AERA.

Zeshan U (2002). A level introductory course in Indian Sign Language. Mumbai, India: Ali Yavar Jung National Institute for Hearing Handicapped.


Copyright (c) 2020 SP Goswami, Anita Ravindra GGR, Kanchan Sharma

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Supported by:


© Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development