Access to Social Organisations, Utilisation of Civil Facilities and Participation in Empowerment Groups by People with Disabilities in Amravati district, Maharashtra

Karthikeyan Govindasamy, Suresh Dhondge, Ambarish Dutta, Tina Mendis

Abstract


Purpose: This survey aimed to assess the baseline level of access to social institutions, utilisation of civil facilities and participation in empowerment schemes by people with disabilities in Amravati district of Maharashtra State, India.

Method: Sixty villages from two blocks in Amravati district were randomly selected for the survey. From these villages, 522 households were sampled and 3056 individuals were surveyed. Interviews were conducted with 590 individuals with disability from among the surveyed population. The structured interview schedule consisted of demographic data, access to social organisations, utilisation of civil services, and participation in empowerment schemes. 

Results: Locomotor disability was the most prevalent (44.6%) type of disability in the study area. Disabilities were more often present among male adolescents and young adults than among the older population and females. Over 50% of the study participants had no occupation (including children and students) and had not been to school. Only 48% had achieved secondary education and more. The proportion of disability among people belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes was considerably higher than among the general population. Access to social institutions was less than 50% for most of the items, and was even lower among females. Except for the ration card and Aadhar card, civil services were generally under-utilised by people with disability. Only 3.2% of the participants were members of self-help groups, and not a single person was a member of the Disabled People’s Organisation.

Conclusions:  In the study area access to social institutions, utilisation of civil services and participation in empowerment schemes was very low.

Limitations: Data, including general socio-demographic, access and utility data, was not collected for the general population but was limited to people with disabilities. This restricted the scope for comparison between people with and without disabilities.


Keywords


Persons with disabilities; leprosy; health services accessibility; access to entitlements; disabled people’s organization; self-help groups

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bowers B, Esmond S, Lutz B, Jacobson N (2003). Improving primary care for persons with disabilities: The nature of expertise. Disability & Society; 18(4): 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000080995.

Dejong G, Palsbo SE, Beatty PW, Jones GC, Knoll T, Neri MT (2002). The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities. The Milbank Quarterly; 80(2): 261–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00004. PMid:12101873 PMCid:PMC2690107

Drainoni M-L, Lee-Hood E, Tobias C, Bachman SS, Andrew J, Maisels L (2006). Cross-disability experiences of barriers to health-care access. Journal of Disability Policy Studies; 17(2): 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060170020101.

Drum CE, Peterson JJ, Culley C, Krahn G, Heller T, Kimpton T, McCubbin J, Rimmer J, Seekins T, Suzuki R, White GW (2009). Guidelines and criteria for the implementation of community-based health promotion programs for individuals with disabilities. American Journal of Health Promotion; 24(2): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.090303-CIT-94. PMid: 19928482

Government of India (2011). Census of India website : Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.

Gudlavalleti MVS, John N, Allagh K, Sagar J, Kamalakannan S, Ramachandra SS (2014). Access to health care and employment status of people with disabilities in South India, the SIDE (South India Disability Evidence) study. BMC Public Health; 14(1): 1125. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1125. PMid:25361570. PMCid:PMC4228146

McColl MA, Forster D, Shortt SED, Hunter DH, Dorland JL, Godwin M, Rosser WW (2008). Physician experiences providing primary care to people with disabilities. Healthcare policy/Politiques de sante; 4(1): e129-47. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2008.19989

Rimmer JH, Rowland JL (2008). Health Promotion for People With Disabilities: Implications for Empowering the Person and Promoting Disability-Friendly Environments. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine; 2(5): 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827608317397.

World Bank (2003). The World Bank and disability in South Asia - A portfolio review. Human Development: 1–21.

World Bank (2017). India | Data. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/country/india?view=chart [Accessed on: 18 Dec 2017].

World Health Organisation (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organisation. 18: 237. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pep.0000245823.21888.71. PMid: 17108795

World Health Organisation (2008). Closing the gap in a generation. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Available at: http://whqlibdoc. who. int/publications/2008/9789241563703_eng. pdf.

World Health Organisation (2011).World report on disability, WHO, Geneva. Available at: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/

World Health Organisation (2017). Community-based rehabilitation guidelines. WHO, Geneva. Available at: http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/guidelines/en/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v30i1.774



Copyright (c) 2019 Karthikeyan Govindasamy, Suresh Dhondge, Ambarish Dutta, Tina Mendis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Supported by:

netherlandsleprosyrelief_logo_rgb_-_new_logo_2014_120CBMlightfortheworld_logo_rgb_-_new_logo_2014_120     

© Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development