Predictors in the Selection of an AAC system: An Evidence-based Report on Overcoming Challenges

Sita Sreekumar, Suja K Kunnath, Vineetha Sara Philip

Abstract


Purpose:  Identification of the most suitable Augmentative Alternative Communication (AAC) device for individuals with varying degrees of communication impairments is immensely challenging. This study aimed to understand the effectiveness of analysing the various sensory, cognitive and environmental factors during the selection of an AAC.

Methods: Four children with different developmental disabilities were assessed in the domains of sensory ability, cognitive skills and environmental factors. The selection of an AAC was primarily dependent on the positive indicators in these domains and the specific challenges pertaining to each participant.

Results: Participants’ progress was assessed. All the children progressed across the levels of the Communication Matrix.

Conclusion: Understanding of sensory perceptual capacities and an attempt to overcome environmental barriers lead to the successful use of an AAC system.  The study attempts to establish a platform for further research on the efficacy of utilising sensory perceptual learning with AAC to overcome communication barriers in children with severe developmental disabilities.

Keywords


Augmentative Alternative Communication; developmental disability; sensory perceptual capacities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antony TL (2005). Individual sensory learning profile. Available from https://mdelio.org/sites/default/files/documents/BVI/ECC/OM/IndividualSensoryLearningProfilebyAnthony.pdf. [Accessed on July 2016]

ASHA National Treatment Outcome Data Collection Project (1997). Functional communication measure. Available from https://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/specedu/slp/pdf/2.pdf [Accessed on August 2016]

Boulmetis J, Sabula AM (2011). Achievement gains via instruction that matches learning style perceptual preferences. Available from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07377366.1996.10400299 [Accessed on July 2016]

Brill MF (2011). Teaching the special needs learner: when words are not enough. Journal of Extension. Available from: http://www.joe.org/joe/2011october/pdf/JOE_v49_5tt4.pdf 5. [Accessed on August 2016]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Developmental disabilities. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/dd/dd1.htm. [Accessed on August 2016]

Rowland C (2011). Online communication matrix. Available from http://www.communicationmatrix.org/uploads/pdfs/handbook.pdf [Accessed on August 2015]




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v1i1.673



Copyright (c) 2018 Sita Sreekumar, Suja K Kunnath, Vineetha Sara Philip

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Supported by:

netherlandsleprosyrelief_logo_rgb_-_new_logo_2014_120CBMlightfortheworld_logo_rgb_-_new_logo_2014_120     

© Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development