Competencies of Students with Visual Impairment in using the White Cane in their Learning Environment: a Case Study at Wenchi Senior High in Ghana

Frank Twum, Wisdom Kwadwo Mprah, Anthony Kwaku Edusei, Joseph Ampratwum, Isaac Adu Gyamfi

Abstract


Purpose: This study investigated the competencies of students with visual impairment at Wenchi Senior High School, Ghana, in familiarising themselves with their learning environment using the cane.

Method: A case study design was adopted for the study. A mixed method approach was utilized in this study. A quantitative approach was used to assess students’ competencies in using the cane while qualitative approach was adopted to probe challenges related to using the cane.

Results: Students had reached higher stages on the Conscious Competence Matrix and were by and large competent in using the white cane in their learning environment.  However, personal and environmental factors were marring their progress. The personal factors included difficulties with fine motor skills and onset of blindness. The external factors were lack of mobility trainers and canes, as well as barriers within the physical environment. There is generally a positive correlation between onset of visual impairment and specific cane skills.

Conclusion and Implications: It is recommended that resource persons devote more time to developing the competencies of students in cane techniques, especially in skills related to identification of obstacles. Modifying the physical environment, as well as providing more canes and additional mobility trainers, will be useful in facilitating the movement of visually impaired students within the school.

Limitations: A major limitation is the lack of objective assessment of residual vision and motor impairment. Residual vision likely played a crucial role during the competency test.

Keywords


Assistive technology; residual vision; conscious competence matrix

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alper S, Rahrinna S (2006). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology; 21(2): 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340602100204

Caparros J (1994). Visual deficiency: Implications for education. Malaga: Ediciones Publishing House.

Crudden A, McBroom LW (1999). Barriers to employment: A survey of employed persons who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness; 93: 341–350.

Fifield MG, Fifield MB (1997). Education and training of individuals involved in delivery of assistive technology devices. Journal of Technology and Disability; 3(2): 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-4181(96)00196-3

Gamble M, Dowler-Hirsh AE (2004). Informed decision making on assistive technology workplace accommodations for people with visual impairments. Blindnes; 31(2): 123-130.

Kid Sense (2016). Fine motor skills overview. [Online]. Available from: https://www.childdeveopment.com.au/areas-of-concern/fine-motor-skills. [Accessed 10 November 2016].

Kotain K, Sharma T (1999). Ensuring equal access to technology: providing assistive technology for students with disabilities: Theory into practice. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness; 20(12): 212-219.

Martinez C (2005). Use of assistive technology by students with visual impairments: Findings from a national survey. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness; 13(4): 322-420.

Mettler R (2008). Cognitive learning theory and cane travel instructors: A new paradigm. 2nd Edition, Lincoln, Nebraska.

Miller J (2002). The role of orientation and mobility instructors and rehabilitation teachers in enhancing employment opportunities for persons who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(12): 852-55.

National Federation of the Blind (1995). Why use the white cane? [Online]. Available from http://www.blind.net/alternative-techniques/mobility/why-use-the-long-white-cane.html. [Accessed on 21 May 2016].

Pateros J (2016). The four stages of learning. [Online]. Available from http://www.processcoaching.com/fourstages.html. [Accessed on 25 May 2016].

Phillips B, Zhao H (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology; 5(1): 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205. PMid:10171664

Sah PK (2010). Assistive technology competencies: Need, outlook, and prospects with reference to special educators for children with visual impairment. American Journal of Disability; 200(15): 22-35.

Smith D (2008). Assistive technology competencies for teachers of students with visual impairment. Texas: Tech University Press.

United Nations Economic, Social and Cultural Organisation-UNESCO (1994). Understanding and responding to children needs in inclusive classrooms: A guide for teachers. Paris: UNESCO.

Vision Aware (2016). The white cane: A symbol of independence or dependence. [Online]. Available from http://www.visionaware.org/blog/visually-impaired-now-what/the-white-cane-symbol-of-dependence-or-independence/12. [Accessed on 21 May, 2016].

Wong ME, Cohen L (2008). School, family, and other influences on assistive technology use: Access and challenges for students with visual impairments in Singapore. The British Journal of Visual Impairment; 100(5): 130-144.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v1i1.611

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Frank Twum, Wisdom Kwadwo Mprah, Anthony Kwaku Edusei, Joseph Ampratwum, Isaac Adu Gyamfi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Supported by:

netherlandsleprosyrelief_logo_rgb_-_new_logo_2014_120CBMlightfortheworld_logo_rgb_-_new_logo_2014_120     

© Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development