Educational Opportunity, Post-School Life and CBR: A Multisectoral Approach in Rural Sri Lanka

Masateru Higashida, M.R. Shantha Kumara, Yuko Nakashima

Abstract


Purpose: Inclusive education and post-school life are crossover issues that cut across societal lines and therefore need a multisectoral approach. This study examines the educational opportunities of children with disability and their post-school life in rural Sri Lanka.

Methods: The research was implemented with multiple sectors in a rural area of the North Central Province, from January - November 2014. Mixed methods were applied as follows: surveys with children with disability aged 2 to 18 years (n=103); case studies of children with disability who dropped out of or did not attend school (n=3); semi-structured interviews with ex-students with disability who had attended special needs classes (n=13); and, informal interviews with a CBR core group officer. Data was mainly analysed with qualitative procedures.

Results: The study consists of 3 parts. The first part revealed that in terms of the current educational opportunities among children with disability aged 2 to 18 years, approximately 31.1% utilised educational resources whereas 38.8% were at home with no special social activities. The case studies in the second part revealed the reasons for limited educational opportunities in the area and the barriers to educational access, which included family members’ attitudes and socio-economic aspects such as poverty. The third part, consisting of semi-structured interviews with ex-students with disability who received education but did not participate in the CBR activities, revealed 3 types of post-school lifestyle: ‘time mostly spent at home’, ‘household chores’ and ‘temporary agricultural work’. The interviews also indicated other barriers to post-school participation, such as a lack of network and information, negative experiences during the schooling period, and families’ priorities.

Conclusions: Inadequate educational opportunities among children with disability and barriers to post-school social participation in rural Sri Lanka are revealed. This study argues the importance of the multisectoral approach to find unidentified children as well as to conduct comprehensive programmes.


Keywords


inclusive education; local resources; social participation; mixed methods

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abeywickrama SP, Jayasinghe IK, Sumanasena SP (2013). Excluded in inclusive schools: Experiences of children with disabilities, their families and teachers in Sri Lanka. Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development; 24(1): 115-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v24i1.172

Abosi O, Koay TL (2008). Attaining development goals of children with disabilities: Implications for inclusive education. International Journal of Special Education; 23(3): 1-10.

Asian Programme of Educational Innovation for Development - APEID (1994). Sri Lanka country paper. In Proceedings of the Fourth APEID Regional Seminar on Special Education. Yokosuka: Asia and Pacific Programme on Educational Innovation for Development.

Association of Women with Disabilities - AKASA (2011). Research report on women with disabilities 2010–2011. Anuradhapura: AKASA. [in Sinhalese]

Bouck EC (2014). The post-school outcomes of students with mild intellectual disability: does it get better with time? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research; 58(6): 534-548.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jir.12051 PMid:23656346

Education For All - Global Monitoring Report - EFA-GMR (2010). Education for all global monitoring report 2010: Reaching the marginalised. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. p.181.

Furuta H (2006). Present status of education of children with disabilities in Sri Lanka: Implications for increasing access to education. Japanese Journal of Special Education; 43(6): 555-565.

Groce NE (2004). Adolescents and youth with disability: Issues and challenges. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal; 15(2): 13-32.

Higashida M (2014a). Local resources of disabled people in Sri Lanka: Action research on community-based rehabilitation programme. Sociology and Anthropology; 2(4): 159-167.

Higashida M (2014b). Community mobilisation in a community-based rehabilitation programme in a rural area of Sri Lanka. Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development; 25(4): 43-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v25i4.383

Higashida M, Illangasingha MG, Kumara MS (2015a). Developing local resources in community-based rehabilitation programme in Sri Lanka: Follow-up study in Anuradhapura. International Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice; 3(1): 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ijrh.2015.030101

Higashida M, Kumara MS, Illangasingha MG (2015b). Promoting participation of stakeholders in community-based rehabilitation in Sri Lanka: Process of action research in Anuradhapura. International Journal of Social Science Studies; 3(3): 50-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v3i3.732

Kawakita J (1967). Hassou-Hou. Tokyo: Chuo-Koronsha. [in Japanese]

Levine P, Nourse SW (1998). What follow-up studies say about post-school life for young men and women with learning disabilities: A critical look at the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities; 31(3): 212-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100302. PMid:9599955

Ministry of Education (2004). The development of education: National report, 2004. Sri Lanka. Available from: http://www.ibe.unesco.org/National_Reports/ICE_2004/srilanka.pdf [Accessed on 25 September 2015]

Ministry of Social Services (2012). Draft of CBR five-year action plan. Battaramulla, Sri Lanka: Ministry of Social Services. Available from: http://www.socialwelfare.gov.lk/web/images/stories/pdf/cbr_national_plan_draft2.pdf [Accessed on 25 September 2015]

Park J, Turnbull AP, Turnbull HR (2002). Impacts of poverty on quality of life in families of children with disabilities. Exceptional Children; 68(2): 151-170.

Parliament of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (1996). Protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, No. 28 of 1996. Colombo: Department of Government Printing.

Poon KK (2013). Parental expectations regarding post-school social attainments of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders in Singapore. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities; 118(2): 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-118.2.95 PMid:23464608

United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: WHO. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=150 [Accessed on 25 September 2015]

United Nations Children's Fund - UNICEF (2003). Examples of inclusive education: Sri Lanka. Kathmandu: UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia.

World Bank (2014). World development indicators (Sri Lanka), 2014. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/country/sri-lanka [Accessed on 25 September 2015]

World Education Forum (2000). The Dakar framework for action. Education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. Paris: UNESCO.

World Health Organisation - WHO (1978). Alma Ata declaration. Geneva: WHO.

World Health Organisation - WHO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation - UNESCO, International Labour Organisation - ILO, International Disability and Development Consortium - IDDC (2010). Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines. Geneva: WHO.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v27i1.482



Copyright (c) 2016 Masateru Higashida, M.R. Shantha Kumara, Yuko Nakashima

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Supported by:

netherlandsleprosyrelief_logo_rgb_-_new_logo_2014_120                   

© Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development