Anushree Narekuli, Kavitha Raja, Senthil Kumaran


Advances in medical science have resulted in a concomitant increase in the life span of persons with disabilities. The prevalence of chronic disease, an aging population and the ongoing shift of the site of care from institutions to the community, have resulted in a significant increase in the informal care provided by family members and friends of those living with chronic illnesses. This in turn increases the burden on the family, by way of physical and psychological stressors.The objectives of this study were to identify the burden perceived by caregivers of individuals with functional disability, and to evaluate the effects of a tailored physical therapy intervention, or caregiver education, on the caregivers’ burden. Ninety seven persons were deliberately assigned, based on their accessibility, to the control group, caregiver education group and intervention group.Although there was no statistically significant difference between the groups, among caregivers of persons affected by moderate to severe disability, there were trends showing greater reduction in caregiver stress and burden in the intervention group.These trends and comments from individual participants point to an improvement in caregiver burden with physiotherapy intervention. Hence, it can be suggested that physiotherapy management of persons with disabilities must also include caregiver health.

DOI 10.5463/DCID.v22i1.17


KePhysical therapy; burden of care givers; functional disability

Full Text:



Cifu DX, Carne W, Brown R, Pegg P, et al.. Caregiver distress in Parkinsonism. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2006; .43(4):499-507. In ProQuest Medical Library [cited 23 March 2003], available ID:1144946271

National Family Caregivers Association and Family Caregiver Alliance. Prevalence, Hours and Economic Value of Family Caregiving, 2006: Updated State-by-State Analysis of 2004. [cited 2009 Mar 23]. Available from:

Family Caregiver Alliance, National Alliance for Caregiving. 2009 Mar 16 [cited 2009 Mar 16] Available from:

Alzheimer’s Association and National Alliance for Caregiving. Families Care: Alzheimer’s Caregiving in the U.S. Chicago, IL:, 2004. Alzheimer’s Association and Bethesda, MD: National Alliance for Caregiving [cited 2009 Mar 16] Available from:

Maryam NW, Feldman PH., Gould DA., Levine C, Kuerbis AN, Dolenan K. When the caregiver needs care: The plight of vulnerable caregivers. American Journal of Public Health 2002; 92(3): 409-413.

PMid:11867321 PMCid:1447090

Women’s Health in the Department of Health and Human Services (2006).[Cited 2009 Mar 16] Available from:

Wright J.. The FIM (TM). The Centre for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury. 2000. [cited 2009 April 16] Available from:

Montogomery RJD, Gonyea JG, Hooyman NR. Caregiving and the Experience of Subjective and Objective Burden. Family Relations 1985;34:19-26.

Robinson B. Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. Journal of Gerontology. 1983. 38:344-348.

Jackle, A Roberts C, Lynn P. Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing: Mode Effects Data Quality and Likely Causes. Report on Phase II of ESS-sallup Mixed Mode Methodology Project, ISER Working Paper 2006-41. Colchester: University of Essex, 2006. [cited 2009 Mar 16] Available from:

De Leeuw E, van der Zouwen J. Data Quality in Telephone and Face-to-Face Surveys: A Comparative Meta-Analysis, in Groves, R. Biemer P, Lyberg L, Massey J, Nicholls II, W, and Weisberg J. (eds), Telephone Survey Methodology, pp.283-299, New York: Wiley, 1988.


Copyright (c) 2015 Anushree Narekuli, Kavitha Raja, Senthil Kumaran

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Supported by:


© Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development